United States v. Avila-Chavez
This text of 87 F. App'x 433 (United States v. Avila-Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Juan Manuel Avila-Chavez (Avila) appeals his sentence for one count of illegal entry into the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Avila contends that the condition barring his possession of “any other dangerous weapon” must be stricken from the written judgment because it conflicts with the sentence as orally pronounced by the district court.
This issue is now foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 934, 937-38 (5th Cir.2003). The district court’s omission of the dangerous weapon prohibition during the oral pronouncement of sentence did not create a *434 conflict with the sentence set forth in the judgment. Id. at 938.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. App'x 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-avila-chavez-ca5-2004.