United States v. Martin
This text of 145 F. App'x 958 (United States v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The district court revoked Brian Rhett Martin’s supervised release term and sentenced him to eighteen months of imprisonment to be followed by an eighteen-month term of supervised release. We affirmed. See United States v. Martin, 87 Fed. Appx. 392 (5th Cir. Feb.18, 2004). On January 24, 2005, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded to us for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See Newsome v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1112, 160 L.Ed.2d 989 (2005) (consolidated petition including Martin). Martin does not now press a Booker claim, conceding that Booker has no impact on this appeal.
We reinstate our prior judgment affirming Martin’s sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 F. App'x 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-ca5-2005.