United States v. Martin
This text of United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7169
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LORENZO GRODE MARTIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00226-TSE)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Grode Martin, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Grode Martin appeals the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part his motion to reduce
his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Martin, No. 1:00-cr-00226-TSE (E.D. Va. June 2, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-ca4-2010.