United States v. Martin

363 F. App'x 229
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2010·No. No. 09-7169·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Grode Martin appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martin, No. 1:00-cr-00226-TSE (E.D. Va. June 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martin, 363 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2010).

363 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Martin
171 F. Supp. 3d 489 (E.D. Virginia, 2016)