United States v. Martin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 F.3d 281
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2009·No. 09-4183·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4183

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES ERVIN MARTIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00330-REP-6)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ervin Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Ervin Martin appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Martin, No.

3:03-cr-00330-REP-6 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martin, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related