United States v. Marshall

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 2006
Docket05-30243
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Marshall (United States v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marshall, (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30243 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC JOSEPH MARSHALL, also known as Slim, also known as John Doe,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (2:03-CR-157-3) --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Joseph

Marshall has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Our independent

review of the brief, Marshall’s response, and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Marshall’s “Motion for Withdrawal of Anders

Brief and Appellate Counsel” is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Marshall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marshall-ca5-2006.