United States v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2005·No. 04-10141·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10141 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MATTHEW MARSHALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-381-ALL-L --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Matthew

Marshall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Marshall was notified of counsel’s motion and did not file a

response. Our independent review of the briefs and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-10141 -2-

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marshall, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Marshall (United States v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)