United States v. Marshall
This text of United States v. Marshall (United States v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-10141 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MATTHEW MARSHALL,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-381-ALL-L --------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Matthew
Marshall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Marshall was notified of counsel’s motion and did not file a
response. Our independent review of the briefs and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-10141 -2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Marshall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marshall-ca5-2005.