United States v. Marquis Nelson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARQUIS ANTHONY NELSON, a/k/a Marquis L. Nelson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00058-1)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marquis Anthony Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marquis Anthony Nelson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to produce certain documents related to his
criminal trial. * We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. 1:08-cr-
00058-1 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Nelson indicates in his informal brief that he also seeks to appeal the district court’s April 13, 2012, order denying his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We decline to consider the inordinately late second appeal from that order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Marquis Nelson (United States v. Marquis Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.