United States v. Marquis Nelson

669 F. App'x 665
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2016·No. 16-7022·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marquis Anthony Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. However, we affirm as modified to reflect that Nelson’s motion is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Modanlo, 762 F.3d 403, 408 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding that “district court does not regain jurisdiction until the issuance of the mandate by the clerk of the court of appeals” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marquis Nelson, 669 F. App'x 665 (4th Cir. 2016).

669 F. App'x 665 (United States v. Marquis Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Nader Modanlo
762 F.3d 403 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)