United States v. Lopez

158 F. App'x 581
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 F. App'x 405
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2005·No. 04-41383·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Lopez has moved to ■withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lopez has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw wherein he raises issues including an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Our independent review of the brief, Lopez’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We decline to address Lopez’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel, without prejudice to Lopez’s right to assert such claims in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir.1987). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, 158 F. App'x 581 (5th Cir. 2005).

158 F. App'x 581 (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Tommy Ray Higdon
832 F.2d 312 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)