United States v. Lopez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 F.3d 427
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2003·No. 02-41684·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-41684 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JOSE NATIVIDAD LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-314-4 --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender (FPD), appointed to represent

appellant Jose Natividad Lopez, has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the FPD is excused from

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-41684 -2-

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Lopez (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)