United States v. Lopez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 F.3d 427
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2002·No. 01-40706·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 01-40706

(Summary Calendar) _________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE LOPEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-39-3

July 8, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jose Lopez has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has not filed a

response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Lopez (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)