United States v. Lopez

146 F. App'x 761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 F. App'x 405
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2005·No. 05-50081·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel for Francisco Rojo Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lopez has filed a response in which he moves for the appointment of new counsel. Our review of counsel’s brief, Lopez’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, Lopez’s motion for new counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, 146 F. App'x 761 (5th Cir. 2005).

146 F. App'x 761 (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)