United States v. Logan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6086

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONNIE LOGAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00068-MR-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Logan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Logan appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Logan, No. 3:00-cr-00068-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13,

2009). We deny Logan’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED