United States v. Logan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6359
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AUNDRA LOGAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00006-LHT-2)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aundra Logan, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Aundra Logan appeals the district court’s order
denying his § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Logan, No. 1:00-cr-00006-LHT-2
(W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Logan (United States v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.