United States v. Logan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Logan. Read the opinion of the Court — 395 F. App'x 38
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2009·No. 09-6359·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AUNDRA LOGAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00006-LHT-2)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aundra Logan, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Aundra Logan appeals the district court’s order

denying his § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Logan, No. 1:00-cr-00006-LHT-2

(W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Logan, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Logan (United States v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related