United States v. Linder

561 F.3d 339, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6664, 2009 WL 756909
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2009·No. 07-6137·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellant filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied.

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Williams and Judges Wilkin[340]*340son, Niemeyer, Traxler, King, Shedd, Duncan, and Agee voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judges Michael, Motz, and Gregory voted to grant rehearing en banc.

Because the poll on rehearing en banc failed to produce a majority of judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Judge Motz wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Linder, 561 F.3d 339, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6664, 2009 WL 756909 (4th Cir. 2009).

561 F.3d 339 (United States v. Linder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clifton Collins v. Harold Clarke
642 F. App'x 212 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Fondren v. United States
63 F. Supp. 3d 601 (E.D. Virginia, 2014)
Anthony Bone v. Marvin Polk
441 F. App'x 193 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Appleby v. WARDEN, NORTHERN REGIONAL JAIL
595 F.3d 532 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Linder
561 F.3d 339 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)