United States v. Linder

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7313

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JASON LANDIS LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5)

Submitted: March 30, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Landis Linder, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jason Landis Linder appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel the Government to move for a

reduction in his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Linder, No.

2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED