United States v. Lewis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F. App'x 322
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2008·No. 08-6813·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6813

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH L. LEWIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00005jpj-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth L. Lewis appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Lewis, No. 3:00-cr-0005-jpj-1

(W.D. Va. May 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lewis, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Lewis (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related