United States v. Lewis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F. App'x 322
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2007·No. 07-4172·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREGORY ADRIAN LEWIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00049)

Submitted: July 20, 2007 Decided: August 8, 2007

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, George H. Lancaster, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Erik S. Goes, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory Adrian Lewis pled guilty to possession of cocaine

base with intent to distribute. In his plea agreement, he reserved

the right to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress, and on

appeal, he contends that the district court clearly erred in

determining that the officers had reasonable suspicion to believe

that he was involved in criminal activity and that he might be

armed. We have carefully considered the arguments of counsel and

the evidence presented to the district court, and we conclude that

the district court did not clearly err. United States v. Rusher,

966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992) (standard of review). Thus, we

affirm the denial of the motion to suppress for the reasons stated

by the district court. (See J.A. at 57-61). Accordingly, Lewis’s

conviction is also affirmed. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lewis, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Lewis (United States v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rusher
966 F.2d 868 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)