United States v. Lee

33 F. App'x 134
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2002
DocketNo. 02-6212
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 F. App'x 134 (United States v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lee, 33 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Pearson Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s [135]*135opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-98-282; CA-00-1192-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2001; Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. United States
537 U.S. 1095 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F. App'x 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lee-ca4-2002.