United States v. Lee

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lee

33 F. App'x 134

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2002·No. No. 02-6212·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Pearson Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s [135]*135opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-98-282; CA-00-1192-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2001; Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eric Pearson Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s [135]*135opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-98-282; CA-00-1192-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2001; Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Lee, 33 F. App'x 134 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 134 (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related