United States v. Lee

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 F. App'x 134
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2000·No. 00-6359·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL LEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-89-273, CA-99-94-5)

Submitted: July 20, 2000 Decided: October 5, 2000

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Stein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Paul Lee appeals the district court’s order denying his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Lee, Nos. CR-89-273; CA-99-94-5 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lee, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related