United States v. Lee

10 F. App'x 235
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 F. App'x 134
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2001·No. 00-7785·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lee, No. CA-00-209-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lee, 10 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2001).

10 F. App'x 235 (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related