United States v. Lee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6902
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TYRONE LEE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-53-R)
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 2, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Lee, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-
tion for modification of his term of imprisonment. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Lee, No. CR-89-53-R (E.D. Va. May 24, 1996). We grant Appellant's motion to amend his informal brief. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.