United States v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-5535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEBORAH F. LEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-382)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborah F. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Deborah F. Lee appeals the sentence imposed after her guilty

plea to bank embezzlement in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 656 (West

1976 & Supp. 1996), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988). We have reviewed the record, including the presentence report and the transcript of the

sentencing hearing, and find that the district court did not

clearly err in assessing a two-level enhancement for obstruction of

justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1.* Nor did the court clearly err when it failed to apply a two-level reduction for acceptance of respon-

sibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Finding no other reversible error,

we affirm Lee's sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (Nov. 1994).