United States v. Lee

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1997·No. 96-6905·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL A. LEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-89-273, CA-95-76-5)

Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 9, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assis- tant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-89-273; CA-95-76-5 (N.D.W. Va. May 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lee, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Lee (United States v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related