United States v. Lassiter

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2009·No. 09-6273·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6273

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONNIE LASSITER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00041-HEH-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Lassiter appeals the district court’s order

denying Lassiter’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lassiter’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Lassiter, No. 3:03-cr-00041-

HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lassiter, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Lassiter (United States v. Lassiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related