United States v. Lassiter

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lassiter

307 F. App'x 714

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2008·No. No. 08-7530·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Lassiter, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion and petition to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lassiter, No. 2:01-cr-00180-RAJ-All (E.D.Va. June 20 & July 11, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Lassiter, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion and petition to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lassiter, No. 2:01-cr-00180-RAJ-All (E.D.Va. June 20 & July 11, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Lassiter, 307 F. App'x 714 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

307 F. App'x 714 (United States v. Lassiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related