United States v. Jones
This text of 625 F.3d 766 (United States v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc in No. 08-3034, and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing,, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
* Chief Judge Sentelle and Circuit Judges Brown and Kavanaugh would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
* A statement by Circuit Judges Ginsburg, Tatel, and Griffith concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
*A statement by Chief Judge Sentelle, joined by Circuit Judges Henderson, Brown, and Kavanaugh dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
* A statement by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 F.3d 766, 393 U.S. App. D.C. 194, 2010 WL 4703743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jones-cadc-2010.