United States v. Jones

625 F.3d 766, 393 U.S. App. D.C. 194, 2010 WL 4703743
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 22, 2010·No. 08-3034, 08-3030·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc in No. 08-3034, and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing,, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

* Chief Judge Sentelle and Circuit Judges Brown and Kavanaugh would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

* A statement by Circuit Judges Ginsburg, Tatel, and Griffith concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

*A statement by Chief Judge Sentelle, joined by Circuit Judges Henderson, Brown, and Kavanaugh dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

* A statement by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 625 F.3d 766, 393 U.S. App. D.C. 194, 2010 WL 4703743 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

625 F.3d 766 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Afifi v. Holder
101 F. Supp. 3d 90 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Tawanda Sheffield, Steven D. Lewis, and Allen Butler v. United States
111 A.3d 611 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
United States v. Harry Katzin
732 F.3d 187 (Third Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Rose
914 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D. Massachusetts, 2012)
United States v. Barraza-Maldonado
879 F. Supp. 2d 1022 (D. Minnesota, 2012)
United States v. Jones
132 S. Ct. 945 (Supreme Court, 2012)
United States v. Cuevas-Perez
640 F.3d 272 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)
Jones v. Horne
634 F.3d 588 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Jones
625 F.3d 766 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)