United States v. Jones

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 F.3d 1145
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 1996·No. 96-6099·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6099

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDWIN JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-138)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edwin Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Granville Douglass, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)

(West Supp. 1995) and USSG § 1B1.10 (Nov. 1995). We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, No. CR-93-138 (E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Jones (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related