United States v. Jones

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 F.3d 1145
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 1996·No. 95-7659·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7659

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWIGHT JONES, a/k/a Shakey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-162-R, CA-95-801)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Jones, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-92-162-R; CA-95-801 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Jones (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related