United States v. Jones

678 F. App'x 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 818 F.3d 1091
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2017·No. 16-1223·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter is before us on Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affir-mance. The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s sentencing determination in this case in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 *780 (March 6, 2017). Appellant Bennie Aaron Jones does not oppose the motion.

Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 678 F. App'x 779 (10th Cir. 2017).

678 F. App'x 779 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckles v. United States
580 U.S. 256 (Supreme Court, 2017)