United States v. Jones
Opinion
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
Defendant Jason Jones seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) so that he can appeal the denial by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to appeal denial of relief under § 2255). A COA “may issue ... only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(e)(2).
Defendant’s sole claim is that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments entitled him to jury findings beyond a reasonable doubt on the elements of his sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). As we informed him when he raised this identical issue on his direct appeal of his conviction, see United States v. Jones, 530 Fed.Appx. 747, *713 754 (10th Cir.2013), this claim has no merit. See United States v. Prichard, 875 F.2d 789, 791 (10th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (“Absent an intervening change in the law of a circuit, issues disposed of on direct appeal generally will not be considered on a collateral attack by a motion pursuant to § 2255.”).
We DENY a COA and DISMISS the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
608 F. App'x 712 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.