United States v. Jones

608 F. App'x 712
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 F.3d 1300
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2015·No. 15-3063·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Jason Jones seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) so that he can appeal the denial by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to appeal denial of relief under § 2255). A COA “may issue ... only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(e)(2).

Defendant’s sole claim is that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments entitled him to jury findings beyond a reasonable doubt on the elements of his sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). As we informed him when he raised this identical issue on his direct appeal of his conviction, see United States v. Jones, 530 Fed.Appx. 747, *713 754 (10th Cir.2013), this claim has no merit. See United States v. Prichard, 875 F.2d 789, 791 (10th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (“Absent an intervening change in the law of a circuit, issues disposed of on direct appeal generally will not be considered on a collateral attack by a motion pursuant to § 2255.”).

We DENY a COA and DISMISS the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 608 F. App'x 712 (10th Cir. 2015).

608 F. App'x 712 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Carl Emmitt Prichard
875 F.2d 789 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Jones
530 F. App'x 747 (Tenth Circuit, 2013)