United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2009·No. 09-6066·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LESTER JOHNSON, a/k/a Main,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lester Johnson appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. 3:95-

cr-00488-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009 & June 22, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related