United States v. Johnson
226 F. App'x 269
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 F. App'x 427 →
Opinion
Crishone Crystal Johnson appeals a district court order denying her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the district court order and the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. 5:96-cr-30022-SGW (W.D.Va. Feb. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Johnson, 226 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2007).
226 F. App'x 269 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)