United States v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 F. App'x 211
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2009·No. 08-8273·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8273

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KELVIN JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:98-cr-00360-CMC-6)

Submitted: June 29, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Johnson appeals the district court’s orders

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson,

No. 0:98-cr-00360-CMC-6 (D.S.C. Oct. 15, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related