United States v. Johnson

193 F. App'x 201

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Craig Edward Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 5:04-cr-00314-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.