United States v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 175 F. App'x 631
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2009·No. 09-6030·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO GERMAINE JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Germaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antonio Germaine Johnson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No.

4:02-cr-00579-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 23, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related