United States v. John Timothy Singer, Jonathan Swapp, Addam W. Swapp, and Vickie L. Singer

868 F.2d 1201, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2524
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 1989
Docket88-2619
StatusPublished

This text of 868 F.2d 1201 (United States v. John Timothy Singer, Jonathan Swapp, Addam W. Swapp, and Vickie L. Singer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. John Timothy Singer, Jonathan Swapp, Addam W. Swapp, and Vickie L. Singer, 868 F.2d 1201, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2524 (10th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

868 F.2d 1201

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John Timothy SINGER, Jonathan Swapp, Addam W. Swapp, and
Vickie L. Singer, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 88-2619, 88-2624, 88-2625 and 88-2626.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

March 6, 1989.

Before MOORE, BALDOCK and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On consideration of the motion and responses of the parties, the en banc opinion of the district court is reversed [695 F.Supp. 1140] and these appeals are remanded for resentencing under the Guidelines. Mistretta v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989).

Numbers 88-2516, 88-2433, 88-2435 and 88-2437 are partially remanded for resentencing. Briefing on the merits of the appeals from the judgments of conviction will continue. If defendants are dissatisfied with the sentences under the Guidelines, new notices of appeal will be required. The sentence appeals, if any, will be consolidated with the appeals of the judgments and short supplemental briefs will be allowed.

Certified copies of this order shall stand as and for the mandates of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mistretta v. United States
488 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Swapp
695 F. Supp. 1140 (D. Utah, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
868 F.2d 1201, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-timothy-singer-jonathan-swapp-addam-w-swapp-and-ca10-1989.