United States v. John Joseph Quirk, II

266 F.2d 26, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3966
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1959
Docket12822
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 266 F.2d 26 (United States v. John Joseph Quirk, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. John Joseph Quirk, II, 266 F.2d 26, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3966 (3d Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted under 18 U.S. C.A. § 1001 for having “ * * * wilfully and knowingly caused the Liberty Federal Savings and Loan Association * * * to submit to the Veterans Administration * * * a false document entitled ‘Application for Home Loan Guarantee of Insurance’ which application contained a false, fictitious and fraudulent statement.”

*27 We agree with Judge Kraft in the district court that where the appellant’s conduct was wilful, as was here shown, the government had the right to proceed under Section 1001 and assume the burden of establishing wilfulness rather than to bring an indictment under the more specific provisions of 38 U.S. C.A. § 715. And we also agree that the wilful submission of the false document was “ * * * calculated to induce agency reliance or action, irrespective of whether actual favorable agency action was, for other reasons impossible” [167 F.Supp. 464] and so established the materiality of the submitted application.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wheeler
247 F. App'x 558 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Harley Reynolds
141 F.3d 1182 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Keller
730 F. Supp. 151 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
United States v. Poindexter
725 F. Supp. 13 (District of Columbia, 1989)
United States v. Naserkhaki
722 F. Supp. 242 (E.D. Virginia, 1989)
United States v. Edgar Salinas-Ceron
731 F.2d 1375 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Kenneth C. Fitzgibbon
619 F.2d 874 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Merlin Voorhees
593 F.2d 346 (Eighth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Pereira
463 F. Supp. 481 (E.D. New York, 1978)
United States v. Lawrence Rose
570 F.2d 1358 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Harold M. Romanow
509 F.2d 26 (First Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Clearfield
358 F. Supp. 564 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
United States v. Sam Ratner, (Two Cases)
464 F.2d 101 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. William Tazwell East
416 F.2d 351 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Jacobson
236 F. Supp. 577 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)
Samuel Lee Blake v. United States
323 F.2d 245 (Eighth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Blake
206 F. Supp. 706 (W.D. Missouri, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F.2d 26, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-joseph-quirk-ii-ca3-1959.