United States v. Jesus Lopez

670 F. App'x 454
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 2016
Docket15-10406
StatusUnpublished

This text of 670 F. App'x 454 (United States v. Jesus Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jesus Lopez, 670 F. App'x 454 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The government appeals from the district court’s order granting Jesus Lopez’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

The government argues that the district court lacked authority to reduce Lopez’s sentence to 151 months. In light of our recent decision in United States v. Ornelas, 825 F.3d 548 (9th Cir. 2016), we agree. In determining the “applicable guidelines range” under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, the district court improperly considered the downward departure that Lopez received at his original sentencing hearing under section 4A1.3(b). See id. at 554-55. The district court should have used the amended base offense level of 33 paired with the pre-departure criminal history category of III, which results in an amended guidelines range of 168 to 210 months. Although Lopez disagrees with the holding in Ornelas, he concedes that it precludes a reduction of his sentence below 168 months. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A); Ornelas, 825 F.3d at 555.

This court has already rejected Lopez’s argument that this application of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. See United States v. Waters, 771 F.3d 679, 680-81 (9th Cir. 2014); see also Ornelas, 825 F.3d at 555 n.9 (noting rejection). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for re-sentencing consistent with our decision in Ornelas.

VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Geary Waters, Jr.
771 F.3d 679 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Hector Ornelas
825 F.3d 548 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jesus-lopez-ca9-2016.