United States v. Jeffrey Leonard Holmes
This text of 525 F.2d 1364 (United States v. Jeffrey Leonard Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
525 F.2d 1364
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jeffrey Leonard HOLMES et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74--2419.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1976.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; David L. Middlebrooks, Judge.
William Stafford, U.S. Atty., Stewart J. Carrouth, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., Mervyn Hamburg, App. Sec., Crim. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph S. Oteri, Martin G. Weinberg, Boston, Mass., for Ashley, and Willy Green.
Selig I. Goldin, Gainesville, Fla., for Holmes, Okus, Moody, Moody, Dewitt, and Williams.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 8, 1975, 5 Cir., 1975, 521 F.2d 859).
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 F.2d 1364, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jeffrey-leonard-holmes-ca5-1976.