United States v. Jean

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2009·No. 08-8342·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8342

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAILE JEAN, a/k/a Shorty Black, a/k/a Jean Saile, a/k/a Desire Jean Sallier, a/k/a Blackie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:01-cr-01117-SB-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Saile Jean, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Saile Jean appeals the district court’s order granting

relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error in

the district court’s grant of Jean’s motion, and we thus affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Jean, No. 9:01-cr-01117-SB-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jean, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Jean (United States v. Jean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related