United States v. Jean
This text of United States v. Jean (United States v. Jean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8342
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAILE JEAN, a/k/a Shorty Black, a/k/a Jean Saile, a/k/a Desire Jean Sallier, a/k/a Blackie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:01-cr-01117-SB-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Saile Jean, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Saile Jean appeals the district court’s order granting
relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error in
the district court’s grant of Jean’s motion, and we thus affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Jean, No. 9:01-cr-01117-SB-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jean-ca4-2009.