United States v. Jean

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jean

319 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2009·No. No. 08-8342·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saile Jean appeals the district court’s order granting relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of Jean’s motion, and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jean, No. 9:01-cr-01117-SB-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saile Jean appeals the district court’s order granting relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of Jean’s motion, and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jean, No. 9:01-cr-01117-SB-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jean, 319 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

319 F. App'x 213 (United States v. Jean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related