United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez

625 F.2d 79, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14449
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 29, 1980·No. 79-5484·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The United States has moved to dismiss the appeal of Manuel Enrique Puig-Arran-go on the ground that he has violated the conditions of his appeal bond and fled the jurisdiction of the court. Accordingly, since the defendant is not presently subject to the jurisdiction of the court below, Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. (4 Otto) 97, 24 L.Ed. 32 (1876), his appeal is dismissed without prejudice, see Estrada v. United States, 585 F.2d 742 (5th Cir. 1978). See also Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970).

APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez, 625 F.2d 79, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14449 (5th Cir. 1980).

625 F.2d 79 (United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pueblo v. Esquilín Díaz
146 P.R. Dec. 808 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1998)
El Pueblo De P.R. v. Jose R. Esquilin Diaz
98 TSPR 138 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1998)