United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez

625 F.2d 79, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14449

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 29, 1980

Docket79-5484

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 625 F.2d 79 (United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray, Manuel Enrique Puig-Arrango and Honorio Montanez, 625 F.2d 79, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14449 (5th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The United States has moved to dismiss the appeal of Manuel Enrique Puig-Arran-go on the ground that he has violated the conditions of his appeal bond and fled the jurisdiction of the court. Accordingly, since the defendant is not presently subject to the jurisdiction of the court below, Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. (4 Otto) 97, 24 L.Ed. 32 (1876), his appeal is dismissed without prejudice, see Estrada v. United States, 585 F.2d 742 (5th Cir. 1978). See also Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970).

APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The United States has moved to dismiss the appeal of Manuel Enrique Puig-Arran-go on the ground that he has violated the conditions of his appeal bond and fled the jurisdiction of the court. Accordingly, since the defendant is not presently subject to the jurisdiction of the court below, Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. (4 Otto) 97, 24 L.Ed. 32 (1876), his appeal is dismissed without prejudice, see Estrada v. United States, 585 F.2d 742 (5th Cir. 1978). See also Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970).

APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 F.2d 79, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jake-h-davis-jr-barry-gene-spence-lloyd-d-murray-ca5-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack