United States v. Jacobs
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7714
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM JUNIOR JACOBS, a/k/a Boogie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00036-FDW-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Junior Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Junior Jacobs seeks to appeal the district
court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Jacobs, No. 3:03-cr-00036-FDW-1
(W.D.N.C. July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jacobs (United States v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.