United States v. Jacobs

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 2010
Docket09-7714
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jacobs (United States v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jacobs, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7714

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JUNIOR JACOBS, a/k/a Boogie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00036-FDW-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Junior Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Junior Jacobs seeks to appeal the district

court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion

for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Jacobs, No. 3:03-cr-00036-FDW-1

(W.D.N.C. July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jacobs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jacobs-ca4-2010.