United States v. Jackson

325 F. App'x 162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 F. App'x 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2009·No. No. 09-6046·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Howard Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for [163]*163reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, No. 0:98-cr-01126-JFA-2 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 18 & entered Dec. 19, 2008; filed Jan. 7, 2009 & entered Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, 325 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2009).

325 F. App'x 162 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related