United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 F. App'x 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 12, 2009·No. 09-6685·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ADRIAN Y. JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-6686

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00191-MR-DCK-5; 3:05-cr-00103-RJC-DCK- 1)

Submitted: August 5, 2009 Decided: August 12, 2009 Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Cary Fialko, RUDOLF, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Adrian Y. Jackson

appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:04-cr-00191-MR-DCK-5; 3:05-cr-00103-

RJC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related