United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 F. App'x 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 1, 2009·No. 08-8320·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL R. JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00125-RLW-1)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. 3:93-

cr-00125-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny Jackson’s

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related