United States v. Jackson
Opinion
Appellate Case: 24-6088 Document: 40 Date Filed: 09/11/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT September 11, 2024 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 24-6088 (D.C. No. 5:23-CR-00305-SLP-1) STEVEN JOE WAYNE JACKSON, (W.D. Okla.)
Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________
Before ROSSMAN, EBEL, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
Pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appellate waiver, Steven Joe
Wayne Jackson pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation
of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced him within the advisory
guideline range to 84 months’ imprisonment followed by a three-year term of
supervised release.
Mr. Jackson appealed, and the government now moves to enforce the appellate
waiver in his plea agreement. See United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328
(10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In response, Mr. Jackson acknowledges that
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. Appellate Case: 24-6088 Document: 40 Date Filed: 09/11/2024 Page: 2
his appellate waiver is enforceable under Hahn and “does not object to dismissal of
this appeal.” Resp. at 1.
Based on this concession, we grant the government’s motion to enforce the
appellate waiver and dismiss this appeal.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.